CCDC




Astex Non-native Set

The Astex Non-native Set is described fully in

    Protein-ligand Docking against Non-native Protein Conformers.
    M. L. Verdonk, P. N. Mortenson, R. J. Hall, M. J. Hartshorn, C. W. Murray
    J. Chem. Inf. Model., 48, 2214-2225, 2008.
    [DOI: 10.1021/ci8002254]
A brief summary is provided below.

The performance of docking packages is most often validated by docking a ligand back into its native binding site and calculating the root mean square distance (RMSD) for the docked ligand pose compared to the native ligand pose. Few validations assess the docking performance against non-native protein conformations, the aim of the Astex non-native set.

The non-native set contains 1112 non-native structures taken from the PDB and was built on the Astex Diverse Set and were selected and prepared using the following methodology:

  • the structure's resolution must be <2.5 Å
  • for each entry in the diverse set, all structures of the same target were retrieved where the structure is either an apo structure or a complex containing a different ligand
  • for each target, every non-native structure was superimposed onto the corresponding structure in the Astex Diverse Set
  • ligands were extracted from the proteins and classified as solvent, cofactor or ligand; binding sites with no ligands were flagged as apo structures
  • in cases where protein side chains were disordered in the non-native structure, only one of the conformers was selected based on occupancy or protein-ligand clashes
  • all structures were then visually inspected
The validation involved docking each ligand from the Astex Diverse Set against all its non-native protein conformers. Both ChemScore and GoldScore scoring functions were used. A spreadsheet astex_non_native_set.xls containing information such as site RMSD, maximum atom movement is provided to assist with selecting the most appropriate structure for the application being tested.

The results of the validation showed that while docking performance against native structures is 80% (top ranked solutions within 2 Å RMSD, it is only 61% for non-native docking. If all solutions are considered, the docking performance increases to 91% for native docking and 71% for non-native.




| privacy policy |
| browser support |
Follow CCDC:

Copyright © 2004-2012 The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre
12 Union Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EZ, UK, +44 1223 336408
Registered in England No.2155347 Registered Charity No.800579